Microcanonical Ensemble §
The microcanonical ensemble is the probability measure for an isolated system with fixed energy , volume , and particle number . Every microstate compatible with those constraints is equally probable. It is the most fundamental ensemble: all others are derived from it by coupling to reservoirs. It is the right tool for isolated systems: a gas in a perfectly insulated box, the early universe, or any system where no energy or particles are exchanged.
Authoritative sources
Equal a priori probability §
The postulate: all microstates with (and fixed ) have probability
where is the cumulative number of accessible microstates — the phase-space volume enclosed by the energy surface . For a classical system:
The thin-shell density of states is .
Details
Step 1 — The axiom. The equal a priori probability postulate is the sole axiom of the microcanonical ensemble. It is justified by ergodicity: a generic isolated Hamiltonian system explores all accessible phase-space volume uniformly over long times. The microcanonical probability is a uniform measure on the region in phase space.
Step 2 — Why cumulative, not shell. The standard convention (Reif, Pathria, Sackur–Tetrode) uses the cumulative count rather than the thin-shell count. The reason is practical: for macroscopic systems, grows so rapidly with that is insensitive to whether one uses the shell or the cumulative volume. The derivative gives the shell density, and when is a power law in .
Step 3 — Phase-space picture. For a single particle in one dimension with Hamiltonian , the accessible region in the $(q,p)$ plane is the interior of the curve . The microcanonical ensemble assigns uniform probability density to every point inside that curve.
Step 4 — The shell approximation. In practice one often writes with but large enough that (many states in the shell). The entropy is well-defined because is negligible on the logarithmic scale.
Step 5 — Classical vs. quantum. For a classical system, is a continuous phase-space volume divided by (the makes it dimensionless; the corrects for indistinguishability). For a quantum system, is simply the number of energy eigenstates with .
Authoritative sources
Example problem
A single classical particle of mass moves in one dimension with Hamiltonian . Compute .
Solution
The accessible region is , i.e. . The phase-space volume is
So . The entropy is and .
Entropy §
The Boltzmann entropy is
This is the bridge from counting microstates to thermodynamics. Temperature and pressure follow as derivatives:
Details
Step 1 — From counting to thermodynamics. The entropy converts the enormous number of microstates into an additive (extensive) quantity. For two non-interacting subsystems, so .
Step 2 — Temperature as an entropy slope. The definition makes the Lagrange multiplier that equalizes when two systems are brought into thermal contact. If , energy flows from 1 to 2 until the slopes match — this is the zeroth law derived from counting.
Step 3 — Pressure as a volume derivative. Similarly, at fixed . Expanding the box increases the accessible phase-space volume, increasing and . The slope gives the thermodynamic pressure.
Step 4 — Shape of S(E). For a system with , the entropy is , which is concave in (since ). This concavity guarantees that energy flows from hot to cold and that equilibrium is stable.
Step 5 — Connection to thermodynamics. The full thermodynamic structure (fundamental relation, Legendre transforms, stability criteria) follows from . See Thermodynamic Potentials and Equilibrium.
Authoritative sources
Example problem
Two isolated systems with entropies and are brought into thermal contact. Total energy is fixed. Find the equilibrium energy split.
Solution
Maximize subject to .
Setting : . This gives , so and . The energy splits in proportion to the “heat capacities” .
Computing the density of states §
The key computational skill in the microcanonical ensemble is evaluating for a given Hamiltonian. Two canonical examples:
Classical ideal gas §
For non-interacting particles of mass in a box of volume , the Hamiltonian is . The phase-space volume with is the volume of a -dimensional ball of radius in momentum space, times in configuration space:
So .
3D harmonic oscillator §
For a single particle in a 3D isotropic harmonic potential , the accessible region in the 6D phase space is a 6D ellipsoid. The cumulative count scales as
(the exponent equals the number of quadratic terms in divided by 2, i.e. ).
Details
Step 1 — General strategy. To compute , identify the shape of the region in phase space. For separable Hamiltonians (sum of independent quadratic terms), the region is a high-dimensional ellipsoid whose volume is known in closed form.
Step 2 — Ideal gas in detail. The momentum integral is the volume of a -dimensional ball of radius :
The configuration integral is simply . Multiplying and dividing by gives the result.
Step 3 — Harmonic oscillator in detail. The 3D harmonic oscillator has 6 quadratic terms (3 in , 3 in ). The region is a 6D ellipsoid. By a linear change of variables, it maps to a 6D ball, and the volume scales as . More generally, a system with quadratic degrees of freedom has .
Step 4 — Scaling and Stirling. For macroscopic , use Stirling’s approximation to simplify. The Sackur–Tetrode equation (next section) is the result of this procedure for the ideal gas.
Authoritative sources
Example problem
A system has quadratic degrees of freedom (e.g., a 2D harmonic oscillator). What is the scaling of and the heat capacity ?
Solution
With quadratic terms, . Then .
Temperature: so .
Heat capacity: . This matches equipartition: . ✓
The ideal gas in the microcanonical ensemble §
The ideal gas is the most important application. Substituting the phase-space volume into and using Stirling’s approximation gives the Sackur–Tetrode equation:
From this, the ideal gas law and equipartition follow directly:
Details
Step 1 — Take the logarithm. Starting from :
Step 2 — Apply Stirling. For large : and . Substituting and collecting terms:
Step 3 — Entropy. Multiplying by gives the Sackur–Tetrode equation. It is extensive: when and are held fixed.
Step 4 — Temperature. Differentiate: , giving . This is the equipartition result: each of the quadratic momentum terms contributes to the energy.
Step 5 — Pressure. Differentiate: , giving . The ideal gas law emerges purely from phase-space geometry — no intermolecular forces are needed.
Step 6 — Heat capacity. , constant and independent of temperature. This is the classical result; quantum corrections (Debye, Bose, Fermi) modify it at low .
Authoritative sources
Example problem
A monatomic ideal gas has particles in at . Compute and .
Solution
Energy: .
Pressure: (about 0.04 atm).
Quantum microcanonical ensemble §
For a quantum system with discrete energy eigenvalues , the microcanonical ensemble counts eigenstates:
The classical phase-space volume is replaced by the number of quantum states. In the semiclassical limit (), the quantum count reproduces the classical phase-space volume. This connection is essential for quantum statistics: the GrandCanonicalEnsemble uses the same density of states to build the Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein distributions.
Details
Step 1 — Discrete counting. A quantum system has a discrete spectrum . The microcanonical ensemble at energy assigns equal probability to every eigenstate with . There is no phase space to integrate over — just a count.
Step 2 — Semiclassical limit. When the level spacing (many states below ), the sum approximates the classical integral . The factor in the classical formula is precisely the number of quantum states per unit phase-space volume (each state occupies a cell of volume by the uncertainty principle).
Step 3 — Connection to quantum statistics. The density of single-particle states (where is the single-particle count) enters the Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein occupation formulas. In the grand canonical ensemble, the total particle number is where is the appropriate quantum distribution. See GrandCanonicalEnsemble for the full treatment.
Step 4 — Example: particle in a 3D box. The energy levels are . The number of states with is the volume of an octant of a sphere of radius in the (n_x, n_y, n_z) space: — the same scaling as the classical result.
Authoritative sources
Energy fluctuations and ensemble equivalence §
In the microcanonical ensemble, energy is exactly fixed: . This is the most restrictive ensemble. When the system is coupled to a heat bath (canonical ensemble), energy fluctuates with . In the thermodynamic limit (), the relative fluctuation vanishes, and all ensembles give identical thermodynamic predictions — this is ensemble equivalence.
Details
Step 1 — Why zero fluctuation. The microcanonical ensemble conditions on a single energy value. There is no randomness in — the system is isolated and energy is conserved exactly. All the “randomness” is in which microstate within the energy shell is occupied.
Step 2 — Canonical fluctuations. In the canonical ensemble, the system exchanges energy with a bath. The energy distribution is . The variance is . For an ideal gas, , so and .
Step 3 — Thermodynamic limit. As at fixed energy density , the relative fluctuation . The canonical energy distribution becomes a delta function at , and the canonical and microcanonical predictions for all intensive quantities (temperature, pressure, entropy density) become identical. This is why one can freely choose whichever ensemble is most convenient for a given calculation.
Step 4 — When equivalence breaks. For small systems (nanoparticles, single molecules, black holes with few degrees of freedom), the relative fluctuations are not negligible and the ensembles give different predictions. The microcanonical ensemble is the correct one for truly isolated small systems.
See CanonicalEnsemble for the fixed- ensemble and GrandCanonicalEnsemble for the fixed- ensemble.
How this fits together §
The microcanonical ensemble is the foundation of statistical mechanics: it defines entropy as a state count () and temperature as an entropy slope (). The canonical ensemble (fixed ) and grand canonical ensemble (fixed ) are derived by embedding the system in a larger microcanonical reservoir. Phase transitions appear as non-analyticities in in the thermodynamic limit. The quantum microcanonical ensemble connects to quantum statistics (Fermi–Dirac, Bose–Einstein) through the density of states.
See CanonicalEnsemble, GrandCanonicalEnsemble, PhaseTransitions, and Statistical Foundations of Thermodynamics.
Quizz §
Problem
A system has microstates (for ). Find , , and the heat capacity . Identify the physical system this corresponds to.
Solution
- Entropy: .
- Temperature: so .
- Heat capacity: (constant, independent of ).
The scaling corresponds to a 3D harmonic oscillator (6 quadratic degrees of freedom: 3 kinetic + 3 potential). The constant heat capacity is the classical equipartition result: . ✓
Note: this is the cumulative count. The thin-shell density of states would be , but for large (they differ only by a constant in the logarithm), so the thermodynamic predictions are identical.